Transgender

Here's another group who will not get air time because they are fighting the subversion: Kara Dansky of the WOLF http://womensliberationfront.org/

sat with Tucker Carlson the other night. I saw the interview and it was good, made sense. WOLF is not to be confused with the Warrant Officer Liberation Front, though.

http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/02/radical-feminist-explains-why-she-opposes-transgender-bathroom-mandate/

https://www.chicksontheright.com/self-proclaimed-radical-feminist-speaks-out-against-transgender-bathrooms/

Last night Tucker interviewed Yvette Felarca who is a California Middle School teacher who organizes "violent" protests. It's horrible and I think Tucker was a bit outdone by her rhetoric because she got her points across that she's in the right and everybody else is wrong and deserves their skulls crushed if thinking differently than she and her ilk.

While civil disobedience is one thing, poignant, even elegant in some cases, protesters lose their narrative when civility collapses. Free speech is embattled. Standing up for individual rights should follow the laws and policies in place. Nothing wrong challenging political decisions or rules, but do so in a non-violent manner when protesting. Choosing to knowingly or unknowingly disregard the laws and policies in place breaks society down and the only recourse is violent exchange from the government and the protesters, bleeding into the civil public. Understanding where people should draw the line between violence and non-violence is key, however, Yvette Felarca has no compunction hurting citizens.

Precursors were set, maybe trial runs in 2016 as in the Costa Mesa protests against Trump for example, where demonstrators were shown on TV vandalizing police cars, widely changed the narrative on why the protesters were there in the first place. No repercussions from either the city or state. Twenty-two percent of Florida’s Republican voters said that after the unrest at Trump’s Chicago rally, they were more likely to support him, as determined in a Monmouth University survey released 14 March 2016. The Democratic Party, many types of politicians, religious groups, educators, police departments, and the media condone the actions of these protesters and even applaud the escalation. This was clearly observed in the recent UC Berkley riots. I say riots because this event is being styled as a protest rather than anarchy.

The Oklahoma City bombing happened because Timothy McVeigh claimed that the government overstepped it's bounds regarding what happened at the Koresh compound in Waco, Texas.

After a time there will be bombings and assassinations.

The Indian Independence Movement and the American Civil Rights Movement worked more or less because of their non-violent messaging. In a democracy, the power lies in the population. While there isn't much popularity born for a government unleashing water hoses and riot batons on civil disobedience, conversely there's little popularity for an angry mob claiming to fight for a higher standard while destroying homes, businesses, and looting, which all had nothing to do with their supposed grievance.

The use of violence by challengers from a "social movement" with some degree of popular support is roughly called an armed struggle. When the challengers are militarily weak, without a normal army, they typically use "unconventional" techniques found in guerrilla warfare. Examples include phases of the American Revolution and the Chinese Revolution.

When violence is against civilians, it is called terrorism. Governments use coercion and violence against civilians as a method of social change. The violence suggested by Yvette Felarca against civilians is used by challengers to governments, such as the Irish Republican Army. It's terrorism.